It's no secret, America is on the road of bypassing the future pursuant to nuclear proliferation. So how does the ratio in negotiations rate when 35 new reactors are projected for construction when the (FSME) has project management responsibilities for 14 decommissioning power reactors?
Since we're on the highway looking for feasible exits of Energy Independence jobs in the United States, the majority of Nuclear Reactors are concentrated in Regions I, II & III. However, what's not taken into consideration is the fact that your security clearance has to be off the charts to even work at these facilities.
So where's the wisdom in putting just everyday Americans to back to work?
Then there's this supply and demand situation just to keep America rolling along where claims from big oil say they don't have the drilling rigs to explore new fields. With new technology to stationary a basic 26 acre area and drill sideways underground to reach the oil, you'd think all shares of recent record profits would invest knowing all the vehicles on the road ain't going anywhere if they don't have the fuel.
So where's the wisdom in saying use it or lose it when new refineries need to be built?
In a time when new refineries should probably work thru & thru in diversification so that it can process "all types of fuels", it makes absolutely no sense to comply with any policy that limits growth of these facilities especially since they'll be built here in America to keep and put Americans back to work.
With key focuses on solar and wind gaining a lot of ground in Region IV, the only words coming out of both the mouths of our Presidential Candidates is to keep old policies at focus where Geo-Thermal Energy keeps up with long speeches to no-where.
The situation is approximately 700 Billion going out of Country and our political savvy is talking about a measly little 15 billion a year to invest in Energy Independence?
Here's some knowledge:
Get bent on the flip flopping wishy washy trajectory and start using that "American" Radical Spirit with real policy that makes sense to all Americans at "equal protection". Being able to get a job with or without a security clearance shouldn't be the issue, and if hostile Countries can get assistance from our American Government when they clean up their act, then so should our convicted felons. ( Of course excluding serious violent criminals ).
Look at Iraq right now. They're radicalizing that Americans get the hell out of there after we helped liberate them. I don't know about their loyalty, but I do know that history proves a lot of American bad guys & gals make the best of individuals because they've been to where they don't want the point of no-return.
IT'S TIME TO RETOOL EVERYONES THINKING FOR ALL AMERICANS TO WIN
That's the question I gather you see I already answered that spreading the wealth or creating wealth just keeps blowing wind with worries of what other Countries think of The United States when we already know and have known.
I'm not saying dis-assemble all our Nuclear facilities, but if American leadership just keeps talking about building more Nuclear Security Facilities, then how does that message translate to North Vietnam, Iran, and other anti-American Countries.
It wasn't a question stupid and thus the period instead of the question mark including the NSF all caps translates as Non Sufficient Funds on that power trip.
BESIDES,
REAL UNDERSTANDING SAYS
AMERICA HAS AN AWESOME GROUND GAME AND IF WE 'RE
TAKING IT TO THE AIR, WE SURE AIN'T GUNNA FLY AROUND WITH NUCLEAR FUEL