Posted by
Jared Masters on Sunday, June 07, 2009 2:31:36 AM
In a trifocal effect to shape his own leadership value of the free world, President Obama outlined his Cairo speech in a low tone-high tempo that the existing phrase of "the status quo has to go" is a newly paraphrased vision of ideology as "one for near, one for intermediate, and one for far". The good thing is that the Prez is telling the far right that he is his own man and it's also "varifiably fruitful" to tell Israel that The United States will no longer give them a blank check to yield or concede to belligerent demands in a conciliatory effort at the expense of justice or other American principles. However, the problem is that the word "ideology" has been a disqualifier as forward momentum of the new majority party and key notes hitting the big bass drum are somewhere along the lines of "Tool" specifically pertaining to the lyrics "liar-lawyer what's the difference" extending into "what it is, what's not, just stop". Translation other than the support of terrorists now labeled extremists? Stop apologizing Mr. President and get to the meat of the matter that Americans like to eat ham, bacon and chops whereas muslims do not but all those pork filled barrels being doled out here, there, and everywhere are not the feasible way to balance the budget to execute the true nature of operation clean slate. And although I'd like to expound an obvious line from the movie "As good as it get's" stated by Jack Nicholson, I'll be more politically correct and say, "Think Kleen and get lean". And now that extremism is the key vocal point instead of terrorism, let's see if any Nation on this planet can compete with America's proud heritage of extreme sports and/or et cettera here in the 21st century's new radicalized way of extending brute force via peaceful competition. It's really all in the exchange of language isn't it?
Americans who have and still do live and die for Democracy to keep living law alive & well do and did so believing that the Constitution in it's core base should be kept within the Framers intent because the revolving "Amendments" door is the right of the people, the States, and the Federal Government to progressively reform that which is not in line with the changing times & space pursuit of happiness continuum. It's just basic science or philosophy of the laws in nature that even Albert Einstein challenged one of his heroes known as Sir Isaac Newton and although some don't get it within their authority of delegation also known as jurisprudence, the fact that Americans can peacefully challenge any policy in times of peace and war is the specific part that shall not be abridge even by Congress who created just about every oversight division of transparency of our great country. So why did Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia opin that "objective intent" is no longer a precedence of law sticking only to the "subjective standard"? The real fact is that the decision allowed law enforcement to get around the fourth amendment in times whereas crime was an overwhelming detriment to society as a whole and since possession is 9/10ths of the Law, owning up to that decision should not completely fall upon the shoulders of one of America's long time respected leading lawyers. Just remember that there is that 1/10th that are and were truly innocent, and until the system is running at 110% the underlying debit of this discomfort is credited to those who understand the theory of philosophy and do nothing about it.
Again we are all in this together whether we like it or not and to give our new President his ways and means credit where debit is due, The United States balance sheet is not in line with the American People's everyday lives whereas that could be our strengthening battle of deference over difference of opinions if the walk the talk thing just learns to validate the real art of networking. Also including and not limited to is the fact is that America the people, America the States, and America the Federal Government are the actual trifocal peripheral and this Country may have been born at night, but it wasn't last night and as a whole We the People are getting tired of being played by our elders exactly translating as all other nations on this planet.
Last words in the lane:
Wanna play a real game of transparency? Czar sounds a lot like seizure as in the state of being seized and a repeat of the last eight years is starting to via something transparent a lot like E=Mc2 sure sounding like the dueling speed of power being massively energized in light of unlawful fruit to ME that c's that every squares' mass of energy has eight corners whereas the point of reference is 9 with a destination of 10 and not the aged old adage philosophy of the 6 to 7 theory.
Post script:
Still don't get it? Naturally Einstein is my "one for far" definate heroes in one dumbfounded thought that cubic feet per second = an atmospheric absolute defying pre-existing notions of gravity; Naturally Ben Franklin is my "one for near" definate hero; and Naturally George Washington Carver is my "one for intermediate" definate hero in an all for one and one for all scenario that is the basic makeup of a little thing "I" like to call upon asking the quesiton in the definitive of my "stationary, add, correct, recycle/delete" theory. So why am "I" adding personals in my politicalwatchdog opins? Basically proving a point that "I" know what makes me tick, you tock whereas "I" also theorize that the clock will not stop. In simple mathmatics 4 "I's" make 4 corners of a box and @ c2 connecting the dots is now and again asking the question in the definitive.
The 57th Delegate...