Posted by
Jared Masters on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:21:48 AM
As Wall Street embraces the impact of President Obama searching for solace in the r-word game of re-regulatory rules for those that reap the most rewards, foundations that balance the newly proposed Consumer financial Protection Agency (CFPA) may or may not weigh in the golden rule that instant re-play in football is a good thing, however, if every single play is reviewed then under achievement becomes the only winning moment at 1st down and goal to go.
In all good intentions that deregulation is, The Artifice of Battle ©2009 simply points out that " negative acquisition" domino effects weren't only created by issuances such as The Airline De-regulation Act of 1978. Additional instances like American lumber mills sold to foreign investors where the majority of raw materials were sent over seas caused finished product building materials here in the United States to go up in price. So what does that really say? Just your simple everyday supply and demand scenario and the fact that Congress and the President's own policies also need reality adjustments when it comes to Free Trade Agreement "fair game rules" at least somewhere around the end quote of "...all's well that ends well".
Basic crisis circumvention(s) are already in line with balancing the scales of justice where feasible arguments are all in agreement that we are in a global recession and that changes of era going from pre-existences of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) should also not not be a toll tax vehicle described as Creating Absolute Bureaucracies (CAB). An excellent example of improper uses of authority is where the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is trying to place a tax on cell work phones. It's plain and simply the wrong direction of "fair game rules" and moreover ignited as a rabid rottweiler that needs a chain and a cage before that disingenuous monster gets out of the bag.
In a sense that all of America's political savvy must also re-organize their own systemic risks. The specific nature that enables them to tell the difference between bad news and those who cause negative attribute such as well organized acts causing them to re-act to un-acclaimed inertia translates as light and transient causes and squarely fits with The Marshall Plan re-invented as America's homeland achievement protocol (AHAP). We are so accustomed to fixing every foreign mud puddle our efforts create and/or journey through that it should just be a natural reaction of formulating initial concepts that improper uses of accruals and inappropriate capitalization of operating costs shouldn't be the whistle blowing aspect, they should be instilled as a 21st century free market pre-conception built into the fabric of our cognitive awareness.
Spelled out in common language? The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Pub.L. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745, enacted July 30, 2002), also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 may have been underwritten that CEO's sign on the dotted line attesting to the truthfulness of their numbers. However, obviously that memo didn't even get placed on the facsimile (fax) machine or we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place. Thus the very reasoning steps of taking the R&D out of recession and depression and returning them where they belong in research and development. The building blocks of our society are structrured on remodel, rebuild, and recycle and that r-game is the one that needs to be over-played even if economic signs are seeing a lift here, there, and everywhere.
Last words in the lane:
The Artifice of Battle ©2009; my own intellectual property rights for non-fiction publication, is translated as "...the cunning quality of being cleverly inventive and resourceful adhering inventiveness in crisis circumvention of any conflict or struggle" and the basic research for today's post is accredited to the hour I spent last night briefing myself with a few pages of Leo Hindery's It Takes a CEO; "It's time to lead with integrity". That's to say there are no tricks up my sleeveless shirts. However, the fact that I started writing notes for today's post whereas this issue only aired this morning? Well that info will more or less be explained with the publication of The Artifice of Battle ©? pertaining to the mental processes of perception, memory, judgment, and reasoning as contrasted with emotional and volitional processes where IQ meets EQ somewhere in the middle.