As Senatorial members of Congress resume general comments for and against the nomination for the Supreme Court Judge Sonia Maria Sotomayor of the U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit, Committee Senators review the resumé of the Waxman/Markey "Climate Change and Energy Bill". 

And so the story goes...

If you walk into a court of law and ask the judge if he or she carries and oath of office and if said judge brought that oath in the courtroom with them, they will immediately calculate an objective view that you're in contempt.  So why would any judge be compelled to dispense such a deluge of injustice throughout their entire well being? The oath of office administers that nothing except any and all precisionism (precise & sharply defined opinion geometrical in formation) be blind upon the scales of justice no matter the weight of argument even if opening remarks have standing that such judge shall not, but will adhere every exact mannerism bound by law. And in a manner of speaking, it plain and simply questions the merit of their authority that binds them to stand trial themselves upon the grounds of competency; relevant and/or irrelevant. However, it's neither ear nor dare and social suicide exacts such outcome whereas meritorious definition of the framers intent pertains to foundation in any days' real moral fiber. 

And goes the story so... 

EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me

The 57th Delegate...

EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me

In the sink or swim shipping lane, President Obama missed the boat with today's announcing efforts to give the bi-partisan Congress a leadership of confidence push on the Energy Bill.

Key points of overtime pay in a 40 hour work week were in the Bernanke Hearing that the FED Chairman "had no regrets for the massive project that was dumped in his lap last year" for keeping America's power players afloat.

In reality Bernanke took a dilemma that looked like a definite stop sign, stood each issue upright on 1 of it's 8 corners one after the other and kept calm while diverting the perfect storm.

Some win and some lose.  It's our natural adapted concept of gravity of what goes up comes down.  So as un-employment heads out on the highway on-ramp instead of getting diverted in the re-routing compromise President Obama asked of Congress for creating, keeping, initiating and promoting jobs, the un-employed may not even be able to get a ride because the loss of payroll, medicare, and social security taxes will En Block half finished infrastructure bridge repairs due to major cuts everywhere for The Great Health Care Compromise.

Even if the un-employed get lucky and secure a job at a carbon capture coal facility, there's only one in Alabama here in the United States and at 1 Billion Dollars per facility, those investors need all the help they can get so they can also invest in ways to make coal mining a safer process. 

Our natural resources and the uses for them don't go away, and the only question to that answer brings us full circle of either finding liquid solutions for cap and trade program or the whole deal will need another round of Bernanke interference.  And although this Country still needs Ben to wade through murky waters, it would be a lot better if dollars for big banking were used from their own enterprising entrepreneurship abilities in the all around loans process that has fail safes built in before the actual default system proclaims success. 

Since we're on the subject of natural resources and mining, there's a "middle ground non-ferrous mining issue" in Minnesota where there's plenty of ore to go around also where the lakes are used for recreation. Since the honeymoon is obviously over with the Obama Administration, maybe Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel can quit re-enacting the Bush Administration up in spending and down in progress to figure out an environmentally friendly time table where issues such as the Minnesota non-ferrous mining issue can route it's usefulness & clean up around recreation months where Americans are surely needing a break from dilemmas of nil-representation when it comes to the people's overall will.  

Last words in the lane:

Americans would start living up to better standards if strategic, tactical, and operational management would finite less micromanagement ways of travel from the President & Congress who at least take a few moments to discuss the real option of any rule's original rationale. What-why?  The everyday American potential for data-flow diagrams that create, keep, initiate and promote jobs in the art of business resumption planning. Where-when?  A model of objects, associations, and activities of how our American ways can all travel around each other through the deciphered process of anticipation that provides relief before disasters entangle the one single common denominator of spend, spend, spend more government spending. 

 

EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me

 

In the absence of quorum, a few members of Congress in the Senate debated the 30 hour rule ensuing the "sovereignty stratagem" of Harold Koh for nomination as State Department Legal advisor. 
 
In worthy attempts to circumvent this nomination, discussions of the Koh ideology were geared around his views that United States policy should conform and adhere to an international rule of law instead of the sovereignty Americans consistently fight, live & die for keeping the international stage from taking away our citizens' rights in due diligence of keeping law makers and enforcers from enacting a clandestine empirical tyranny. And right now in history, what our Country went through is well informed through the media via Iranian policy that's the brutal characterization of observation without using scientific method of theory executed with the secrecy of concealment instead of allowing freedoms to regard peaceful demonstration as the platform for voicing what detriment(s) faces them most.

As the most popular vote of the people, the "sovereignty stratagem" is not a plan, scheme, or trick in surprising deceit of the people from this Country, it's a guaranteed right of our freedoms strictly grounded in our Declaration of Independence.  Not only is this most popular, but it's most favorable whereas keeping government out of peoples' personal lives except where tax allocations are concerned as well as protections of our collective embodiment as the States United also guaranteed in the separate but equal clause.
 
Not to say our Constitution is perfect certainly implying not imperfect, there are many facets of our society that have become comfortably numb and when it comes to our legal system, the three friends and a stranger "sovereignty stratagem" is one of the worst purely translated as "the status, dominion, power, or authority who use any artifice, ruse, or trick devised to attain a goal for gaining an advantage over another".  Even more within this interpretation, the 3/1 ratio stratagem references that courts are so overloaded that an almost mandated common practice is that the prosecutor and defense attorney will overtly plea bargain the entire case load whereas the judge will hand down the fiercest of penalties if the defendant loses in a criminal trial. Civil law also has this unbalanced perception, however the good thing about our system is that there is an appellate system whereas international policy is moreover based on premise of the "you're cooked on all sides" reactionary measure to contain actions of any person, place or thing that goes against the grain.  The overall good thing about our system?  It's why we've come so far in such a little time, and why other nations look to us for leadership instead of us of them.

The gotcha good faith example of the "sovereignty stratagem" is how Democrats maneuvered union votes and monetary support for returns whereas auto worker union leadership gained ownership of vehicle manufacture infrastructure over shareholders.  On it's face it looks like big government invoked it's overwhelming force to bully investors out of their rights.  However sad but true, the real lesson learned is that legislation re-write support actually undermined an immoral socially accepted system in an end to a means where shareholders disregard the livelihood of workers as easy as slicing butter with a hot knife.  With regards to morality? The simple translation is that emphasis is placed squarely in view that the worker is the important factor instead of a race horse put out to pasture before it's time without the benefits they put forth extra effort everyday to achieve.  Nothing more and nothing less except of course for scandalous union leaders that manipulate the process while claiming to protect workers rights.

The sense of imperfection is that there are flaws with every system and this Country has the satisfaction of challenge in correcting discrepancies where an overall international policy will not. In view of that, the problem with the political genius of the General Motors/Chrysler deal is that valuable franchise ownerships were caught up in the cross fire as victims of the 3/1 ratio stratagem and if we as a Country are to overcome in leaps and bounds without opening the flood gates of an already overwhelmed judicial process, all political savvy should be reminded that our National heritage of immigrants came here to get away from all tyrannical cycles that observe the "spoils system" as the accepted social Czar network it really is.

Last words in the lane:

In view of Harold Koh and other great white shark attorneys in need of being deposed by "The Orca", sometimes lyrics in music move moments like the navigant un-sung hero in the periodic table of elements reminiscent of "sometimes the darkest hour never comes at night", and the cross reference shepard's citation is that the un-sung hero in the periodic table is the American Element (Hu¹) reviewing previous laughter that echoed all the way to the bank in favor of the shinedown take your medicine ideology. Nothing more and nothing less pursuant to the perfection of colloquy of course excluding extraneous materials.

The 57th Delegate...  
 

EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me