Posted by
Jared Masters on Friday, June 26, 2009 11:20:17 AM
In the event to revise and extend remarks, congressional pros and cons abdicated the bridge v. abridge value of The Climate Change and Energy Bill (HR 2454) in the House.
With the forth wit structure of the Bill proclaiming to eradicate traditional cap measures, the new proposal held loud opposition for granting weight to the Lobby Industry and maybe Congress should write legislation that would make lobbying a public enterprise so Americans can trade stocks & futures on the rise and fall of lobby groups since they really are a hedge leverage industry. If you can't join 'em, then beat them at their own game is certainly on the minds of about 200 million Americans and would probably get rounds of cheers all across Nation.
As members went into rules debate, minority arguments in opposition brought up the word repeal and decidedly held fast the traditional thought of why enact today what you can put off until 6 months from now as the majority kept that in mind like it was night at the museum visiting comedy hour at the Improv. Key point of the all American variable gut instinct provisional necessary? Enough is enough of clinging to the side of a cliff of outsourcing jobs and dependence on foreign oil are the base thesis, and as America still heavily relies on oil all over the Country, no moratorium lifts of oil drilling & shale excavation were offered from alleged bi-partisan members who are sponsors and supporters of (HR 2454). And that would be the tax us thru and past death Democrat Party so there's no ambiguity clearly translated as transparency.
In the Bills' set standard for water and buildings creating credit for carbon reduction renamed as the cap & tax program relayed by opposition members, Washington State is a mainly a hydro-electric base energy supplier and Jay Enslee, US Representative from 1st District of Washington State pointed out on c-span that although he is involved in drafting the Climate Change and Energy legislation, it leaves out accreditation for the hydro-electric division.
With heresay being the common place for design & structure in the (HR 2454) building plan, just one intrigued concept of unprecedented thought presumes. If a 12 story building has a central air system where forced air is a constant through the center of that structure from 7am - 7pm in an area of 12' x 12' x 120', will the final draft of (HR 2454) promote & grant studies in the private sector to design a smaller version of wind turbine to help reduce that buildings' energy cost expenditures? At this time in history, known resistance limits currently prevent making this idea feasibly profitable because re-action causes the action to work harder in need of exta energy supplied from the original source that doesn't balance out the profitablity to install these units in existing structures as a remodel.
The reason for such an explaination of "my intellectual property rights ©2009" is to demonstrate that self sufficient, self sustaining, and independence is the morale of this Country and Republicans on the Hill more times than many forget this well founded base when it cuts into marginal profits. The translation is that they would block this type of product because it would cut into the profits of the energy companies who fund their elected status. And however this statement spells itself out as, "favoring-the-progress-for-improvement-as-opposed-to-wishing-things-to-maintain-as-they-are-via-redress-of-what-is-wrong-corrupt-and-unsatisfactory", hopefully both sides of the isle will have time to think about their base platform when America celebrates the 4th of July this year.
*It's one of the reasons why I resigned as an Old Gaurd Republican and registered as the founder of "The American Party" at a Washington D.C. DMV in Georgetown.
3 hours of general debate, 1 GOP Amendment and 1 GOP Amendment to change The Climate Change and Energy Bill were laid on the table including a motion to recommit that most of the time kills a Bill, and as this saga continues in the dramatized version of "America is Waiting", there's only one thing left to rightly say.
The American people went to the poles invalidating the McCain/Palin ticket because they were tired of, of, in the direction of; invading other countries on a whim; leadership doing nothing about high gas prices while green technology hit every road block possible; businesses like Walmart invading and crushing small business America without a contingency for those still viable businesses; Wall Street laughing all the way to the bank while main street constantly got pushed further in the gutter; and the Republican Party just creating situations that send entire families into an alley of darkness where the gutter and homelessness are the only option.
Last words in the lane:
Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee's 7th District can rant all she wants like calling the Democrats the new public punishment party. As for Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota's 6th congressional district advocating Liberty over Tyranny? Notwithstanding the fact that the Bush Administration de facto rule put America in this mess with the help of the Republican Party, Americans are moreover tired of politicians claiming to be the family values party and running on "slander" tickets that do nothing about what really matters around the kitchen table except degrading the less fortunate & less affluent as losers when they can't help themselves. And the best thing said in the 3 hours of general debate was that an informal conversation at the ways and means committee is in the best interest of all parties because the people have spoken that they want new and unprecedented directions for this Country to proceed. Again including and not limited to utilizing all natural resources we have so 10 years from now we aren't out of gas still relying on the dependence of foreign oil.
The 57th Delegate...